In
the year 2040, it will be difficult or impossible to remember the
4 reds (www.redredred.red).
Unit 002
Because
of the oddball effect, two of these 10-second video clips seem shorter
than the others.
002A > 10
seconds from 01:00 to 01:10
002B > 10
seconds from 00:49 to 00:59
002C > 10
seconds from 11:12 to 11:22
002D > 10
seconds from 00:15 to 00:25
002E > 10
seconds from 01:11 to 01:21
Unit 003
It
is legal to break the law if you use the "Defence of Necessity"
and prove 3 things:
1) There
was an imminent peril or danger. 2) There was
no reasonable, legal alternative to the illegal course of action
you took. 3) The harm (if any) you inflicted was
proportional to the harm you avoided.
Unit 004
R.
v. Morris (1994): A driver charged with speeding was in the left
lane when a speeding vehicle approached her from behind. She used
the "Defense of Necessity" to justify why she exceeded
the speed limit to pass the vehicles on her right so she could change
lanes and get out of the way of the vehicle behind her.
Unit 005
A fundamental
legal principle in most of the world is expressed as follows in
Section 19 of the Criminal Code of Canada: "Ignorance
of the law by a person who commits an offence is not an excuse for
committing that offence."
